Skip to content

Conversation

@ioannad
Copy link
Contributor

@ioannad ioannad commented Sep 18, 2024

Following up on @ljharb's suggestion #535 (comment)

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

Maybe we could link to WPT tests instead? The discussion in plenary was "this cannot be tested in test262, but we approve stage 2.7 because it's at least tested in WPT".

@ioannad
Copy link
Contributor Author

ioannad commented Sep 27, 2024

@nicolo-ribaudo are there WPT tests already? If not, we could add a link to them later either here or in the test262 issue.

@nicolo-ribaudo
Copy link
Member

cc @lukewarlow :)

@lukewarlow
Copy link

https://wpt.fyi/results/trusted-types?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=eval this shows the various test files that test TT with eval.

https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/trusted-types%2Feval-csp-no-tt.html this is probably the one closest to testing the pure tc39 aspect of this.

Copy link
Member

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

rebased, and landing

@ljharb ljharb merged commit 78b2425 into main Jan 11, 2026
@ljharb ljharb deleted the no-tests-link-for-DCBC branch January 11, 2026 23:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants